Ethnic Apocalypse, page 15
This Judeophobic murder, which followed many others, marked a symbolic turning point in the rise of this new anti-Semitism, one that is bound to play a major role in the event of an outbreak of civil war. In the wake of the mostly Muslim mass immigration (or at least one that is becoming increasingly Muslim in our country — for the more people rub shoulders with the bearded men inhabiting the housing estates, the more some convert in order to survive), what one notices, according to Georges Bensoussan, is the clear emergence of a new anti-Semitism that has broken with the previous one. It has nothing to do with that of our contemporary far Right, which, incidentally, is in a state of complete decrepitude, nor with that of the old Catholic circles and their hunger for conspiracy theories (Pierre Hillard,121 for instance, is completely out of his mind).
Unlike the one experienced after the war, which was both very theoretical and literary, this new anti-Semitism kills and leads to daily violence. Fifteen Jews were murdered between 2006 and 2018, not to mention the approximately fifty others that were wounded, the spread of aggressiveness and constant threats on the part of you know who, and the targeting of middle-class and working-class Jews, whose children can no longer even attend public school. Nowadays, their situation in France is more distressing — much more, even — than that of their parents who once fled from the Maghreb, which is completely unacceptable. A domestic Jewish exodus (with 80% of all Jewish residents having left the Seine-Saint-Denis area within a period of fifteen years) has gone hand in hand with an Aliya towards Israel (totalling 52,000 departures between 2003 and 2016), not to mention the Jewish emigrations that have not been accounted for to other countries of the world. Fleeing France has become their priority! It is as if the Jews had understood well before us natives that the country is going to be torn apart by the horrors of a civil war.
In an interview with Le Figaro (24th April, 2018), it was once again Georges Bensoussan who remarked:
The forces of denial remain powerful. … While denouncing anti-Semitism (“Never again!”, they say), one continues to make sure that the source of danger is no longer named.
Indeed, what matters more than anything else is for one not to be suspected of the capital, blasphemous and ruthlessly punishable sin of Islamophobia. Alluding to ethnic partition, which acts as a preliminary condition for the outbreak of a future civil war, Georges Bensoussan goes on to add:
One is all the more intent on mentioning the notion of our “living together” because it is not actually together that we live, but side by side.
In his eyes, this new anti-Semitism, which is mainly of Muslim-Arab origin, ‘no longer speaks the language of racism but, on the contrary, that of a self-victimising and communitarian ideology that adorns itself with anti-racist rags. Yet it is a perverted sort of anti-racism.’ In this regard, one cannot help but think of Les Indigènes de la République.
He then predicts the following:
In spite of the increasing and probably sincere proclamations, there is little doubt that French Jews, and above all, or perhaps even exclusively, those that stem from working-class Judaism, will be left to their fate, just like the “Peripheral France” of Christophe Guilluy, which is subject to the same logic of abandonment.
Here, the parallel drawn is truly a very appropriate one. Yes indeed, they shall be abandoned by our crooked politicians and intellectual-mediatic elites and condemned to suffer their ordeal in the face of the insane immigration, intrusive Islamisation and increasing barbaric criminality of Muslim-Arabs. This is where Georges Bensoussan’s analysis becomes most interesting: in the event of a racial war, and especially because Jews are seen by such scum as a people in their own right (and therefore a race), the fate of the ‘petty Jews’ that find themselves on the front line would not be enviable at all. They would become the primary targets of the violence unleashed by those who claim to be their hereditary enemies. And the state, followed by its cowardly justice system, would never come to their defence…
For it is neither the CRIF nor the pretentious ministers that commemorate the Vel’ d’Hiv Roundup122 that will rush to their aid and protect them. As for the despicable clique of court Jews belonging to the upper intellectual-mediatic classes, all of whom are very well-represented and active in the Islamosphere and remain indifferent to the fate of their modest co-religionists (who are considered poor before they are considered Jewish), they are mistaken when they believe themselves to be safe. The eye of Islam is upon them and will not let them out of sight. To a Muslim, all Jews are equally vile.
Trivialised Anti-Semitic Sermons
The Algerian Mohamed Tataï, the imam of Toulouse, where Mohamed Merah killed both children and adults in the Jewish school of Ozar Hatorah, once maintained very good relations with local community leaders (there are now 40,000 Muslims in this city, totalling 10% of the population — ouch!). This, however, was only meant to pull the wool over their eyes. In December 2017, he undertook to preach an openly anti-Semitic sermon in Arabic which began with a passage taken from the hadiths and attributed to Sahih Muslim (821–875), a venerable and knowledgeable imam globally regarded as one of the masters of Islam, whose teachings are sacred and cannot be called into question: ‘Shortly before a decisive battle, a deadly battle, the Prophet said onto us: “The Day of Judgment shall not come until Muslims have fought against the Jews, and there shall not be a single Jew hiding behind a tree or a stone without that tree or stone saying, “O Muslim, O servant of God, a Jew hides behind me, come forth and slay him”’.
Having read this remarkably childish excerpt from the hadiths, which are considered as sacred as the Qur’an itself, the Imam Tataï embarked on an anti-Israeli and, by extension, anti-Semitic diatribe. He was subsequently reprimanded by the ever-prudent and cunning Dalil Boubakeur, the rector of the Great Mosque of Paris, and a complaint was filed against him not only by the Union of Jewish Students of France but also by the LICRA,123 whose members accused him of inciting racial hatred. In harmony with the Arab manner of displaying impudent bad faith and taking one’s interlocutors for imbeciles, the Imam Tataï explained that his preaching was, on the contrary, philo-Semitic and urged Muslims to respect Jews. Is there a point to such cavilling? In its sacred texts, which have now been taught everywhere for tens of generations and include both the Qur’an and the hadiths, Islam is consubstantially anti-Semitic and hostile to Jews in any shape or form. Both Islamic teachings and Muslim culture sustain and transmit this permanent feature.
Have the Jews Been Entrapped
by Their Own Doublespeak?124
The truth is that the Jewish ethnicity is in a state of permanent contradiction, one that is encountered, above all, at the level of its very definition. Are they an ethnic entity, a nation, a race, or a religious community? The Jews themselves are often ill at ease when asked to answer such queries. ‘Who are we?’ is a question whose answer seems to evade them. They would rather answer the opposite question and say: ‘Consider rather what we are not’. Whatever the case, the feeling of belonging to a Judaic or Israeli entity is much more pronounced among the middle and lower classes — which comprise a Sephardic125 majority — than among the upper classes of Jewish origin. This situation is currently becoming increasingly conspicuous.
Indeed, religion seems to be at the very heart of the Jewish ethnicity, despite the fact that Jewish religiosity is, by contrast, very weak. Judaism is a religion in the strictest etymological sense — for it binds (re-ligere) people in an ethnocentric way. The relations it has established with its god are, however, of a political and contractual nature, keeping a certain distance and lacking the mysticism of esoteric beliefs. In the Jewish home, agnosticism coexists with ritualism. Their rabbinic and Talmudic theology rejects any and all emotional approaches, because the calculating mindset and analytical means of Judaism are devoid of the slightest hint of romanticism. Judaism dismisses anything sacrosanct — in the Hindu or Catholic sense of the word — and excludes superstition, which constitutes yet another aspect in which it differs from Islam.
The Jewish soul finds itself continuously torn between exacerbated particularism and a universalistic sort of tendency; between its ghettoised spirit and its conquering mindset. Its desire for martyrdom is thus combined with its need to dominate and feel safe. Within the consciousness of the Jewish soul and in accordance with the sacrifice offered by Abraham, the persecutions suffered by the Jews in the course of history (with the Shoah embodying the latter’s metaphysical coronation) bestow upon the Jewish people a sacrificial and mystical trait, an exemplary emblem of the suffering man. This syndrome is a very ancient one, for what Christ represents on an individual level is nothing more than the resumption of the martyrological position espoused by the people of Israel — a sacrificial emblem of humanity’s salvation. I urge all those who would accuse me of extrapolating to consult the Bible in this regard.
This results in a number of contradictory features: their seeking of peace and security while relishing the idea of being jealously hated and persecuted; their aspiration to dominate and proud acknowledgement of their intrinsic superiority, alongside their embracement of the image of a small people that is perpetually under threat. It also corresponds to the twofold allure of an international diaspora and the Zionist idea of returning to one’s sacrificial and inalienable homeland; and, even within Zionism itself, to the discrepancy between the purely Jewish vision of Eretz Israel126 and the secular and open concept of a Jewish state.
These contradictions do not necessarily act as prohibitive factors. On the contrary, they give rise to a feverish and unique sort of energy among the members of this small people. Despite being nomadic, the Jews have, in the course of their own history, become profoundly rooted in their own particularism — that of their Semitic origins. Simultaneously, however, they have joined and become part of the adventurous undertaking embodied by our European civilisation. The Jews have shown great skill when it comes to influencing the West through the very power of their mythological vision and intelligence, which is much more neocortical than limbic.
They have thus proved to be a small minority capable of playing a role that is disproportionate to its actual size.
Returning to the anti-racism promulgated by some contemporary Jewish intellectuals, what one must understand is that these agents of cosmopolitan influence (Jacques Attali, Bernard-Henri Lévy, and Dominique Strauss-Kahn, for instance) are basically what has become known as ‘court Jews’. In addition to being more or less uprooted, they do not concern themselves much with the Jewish ethnicity from which they stem — so much so, in fact, that they would have no problem serving a Muslim government in an Islamised France. Their struggle to spread cosmopolitanism in France and other non-Jewish states bears no connection to a desire to protect Israel from these countries by disseminating the leftist poison in them in such a way that their ethnic homogeneity is left eroded and their indigenous population emasculated.
The fact is that among Jewish intellectuals, those who support cosmopolitanism would like to see it triumph everywhere, whether in Israel or in other lands such as France, Germany, Great Britain and America — not to mention the fact that most of them are openly anti-Zionistic. There is, however, a serious analytical mistake made by numerous anti-Semitic writers, especially Kevin B. MacDonald — that of focusing on the psychological traits of Jewish intellectual movements that are in favour of cosmopolitanism, and of confusing these traits with the behavioural and mental patterns of the Jewish ethnicity. As the intellectual influence of court Jews declines in the West, a growing proportion of ‘common Jews’ are now rejecting both anti-racism and cosmopolitanism, partly in response to the Muslim-Arab invasion.
Tomorrow’s Jews will be modelled on the infamous Ulcan, whose real name is Gregory Chelli. Having initially been obsessed with the idea of hunting down imaginary white Nazis hiding among dissidents, Gregory Chelli, a mentally unstable hacker, then chose to target radical Islam, Islamo-leftists, the Israelis and the French with his malicious intent (I will obviously not praise this featherbrain, since he is out of his mind). Characterised by his unusual animosity towards Palestinians and Muslims by and large, he has declared, in some of the videos that he originally posted through Periscope,127 that one should ‘trample the heads of Muslim babies’ in order to free the world of the terrorist barbarism that they allegedly bear within themselves since birth. No longer does he conceal his Islamophobia nor his focus on what he considers to be our primary enemy.
Why Do Jews Have a Better
Survival Instinct than Christians?
Whereas Christianity comprises a certain masochism that it exacerbates further, there is neither an appeal to espouse weakness and submission nor a grandiloquent and castrating message to be found in Talmudic Judaism (rather the contrary, if anything). The latter embodies essentially the views of Friedrich Nietzsche, who, in addition to being a ferocious denouncer of Christianity, was also a fervent admirer of the Jewish diaspora and a vigorous opponent of anti-Semitism. The precept that commands you to ‘turn the other cheek’ has nothing to do with the Talmud. By preaching a socialistic hatred of the rich and the submission of ethnic Europeans to Maghrebian, African and Asian colonisers, Pope Francis is actually in full harmony, and not contradiction, with the teachings of the Gospels. The Catholics reading my book will find these words difficult to accept and digest, but by urging the Christian world to welcome migrants, our contemporary pope is merely implementing the actual message found in the New Testament, just like an Islamist terrorist would basically proceed to apply Qur’anic precepts. I have read those texts well and can affirm this without hesitation.
The current emasculation afflicting traditionally Catholic countries is nothing but the ultimate result of the prevalence of Judeo-Christian values in the West.
At the same time, the Promethean challenge of biotechnology — a positive type of eugenics involving direct genomic intervention in an effort to improve heredity — poses an enormous problem that runs up against the sensitivities of both monotheistic creationism and anthropocentrism. Talmudic Jews will certainly be more willing to accept whatever shape will be assumed by tomorrow’s ‘improved’ man and integrate it into their religious narrative. In comparison to them, Catholic Christians shall be reluctant to embrace this development and shall, in the long run, suffer a civilisational setback that will turn them into a kind of European Muslims (pardon the expression), but without the latter’s propensity for violence and hatred, of course.
Chapter IX:
Our Law Enforcement Organisations Are at the End of Their Rope
In the eyes of the famous criminologist Alain Bauer, ‘our national police are experiencing a strong material and moral crisis’ (Le Figaro, 10th July, 2018). To a large extent, his warnings anticipate the coming inevitable ethnic clashes. He then goes on to add that ‘in terms of deadly violence of all conceivable kinds, and regardless of any terrorist context, the French situation is a highly challenging one and raises many questions. … Every passing day highlights a violence that disrupts the daily lives of our citizens’. And yet the fact remains that this daily violence faced by everyone — including our certified, indignant and dogmatic anti-racists — mostly involves Maghrebian and sub-Saharan African individuals, which is a source of great annoyance for all those self-righteous people.
Some famous left-oriented female YouTubers (Tatiana Ventôse, Antastesia) have had the honesty to admit that whenever they have been aggressed, it has always been at the hands of men originally from the Maghreb. Their words have caused a small scandal in the otherwise extremely uneventful world of those whose passion lies in the consumption of brainless and narcissistic videos. Their sincerity, for which we are grateful, has once again proven us right.
The Fanaticised Troops
Have Reached Critical Mass
The main driving force behind a potential civil war between enemy peoples — a war that is likely to break out in France and Europe in the first half of the twenty-first century — is the considerable (multi-million) mass of Maghrebian, Negro-African and Middle Eastern populations, whether of foreign nationality, French nationality or any other formal citizenship (which they despise and benefit from) by right of soil or naturalisation. They have thus reached critical mass, a quantitative threshold beyond which all control becomes uncertain and unpredictable. This young, non-European population displays some rather disturbing characteristics of hostility, as highlighted by many sociological studies and surveys, especially Anglo-Saxon ones.
First of all, a great many of them approve of both Islamic terrorism and warmongering jihad against ‘unbelievers’ (to use their expression), i.e. of any ultra-violent act and murder targeting Europeans on their own soil — all, of course, in direct contradiction to the stupid but seemingly non-disposable dogmas of integration and assimilation.
Secondly, the lack of sanctions imposed upon immigrant and foreign juvenile delinquents and the latter’s growing presence not only in the suburbs or ghettos of peri-urban housing estates but also in all cities of more than 25,000 inhabitants constitute explosive factors that have been completely neglected by the state.
The alarming intensification of youth violence stems from the majority of our populations of immigrant origin, with nearly 200,000 minors accused by the police and the gendarmerie in 2017 — twice as much as in 1990. What this indicates is that, in the event of a civil war, the establishment of a recruiting base for enemy troops would easily be ensured.
