Ethnic Apocalypse, page 11
Chapter VI:
The Islamosphere and the Pathetic Collaborationist World
The Islamosphere includes both non-European Muslims that are active in combative militance (which is, of course, logical) and genuine French people who have chosen the path of collaboration.
A Pathological Way of Perceiving Muslim-Arabs
Fascinated by Islam, many French members of our elites (our political and associational leaders, intellectuals, or journalists) spread the idea that Muslims embody the new image of the oppressed. They discredit any and all criticism in advance, even when it is aimed at murderous and premeditated Islamic terrorism. What is important to them is defending the Muslims against the Whites, who are blamed for all conceivable evils and whose dominance, exclusions and cynical exploitation through the ages constitute crimes that have never truly come to end.
Muslims, even the radical ones among them, are the aggressors presented as the aggressed, as part of a highly classic example of sophistic reversal. For instance, the Islamospheric clique detests the French writer Alain Finkielkraut, a man who is thus regularly insulted, threatened, and labelled ‘hysterically Islamophobic’, with Eric Zemmour, Elisabeth Badinter84 and, lately, Pascal Bruckner85 attracting an equal amount of hatred, despite the fact that all these voices are actually Jewish. The ones that they hate most, of course, are apostates and harkis, those Muslim-Arabs that are critical of both their own culture and the excesses of Islam, including Kamel Daoud, who scandalised the Islamosphere by denouncing, in the aftermath of the assaults and rapes perpetrated in Cologne on New Year’s Eve, 2016, ‘the sexual misery pervading the Muslim-Arab world and its pathological relationship with women’ (as I have already mentioned above). He has thus established a blasphemous sort of truth. An unforgivable one, in fact.
Using any means necessary, the scheming collaborationists of the Islamosphere seek to weaken the defensive reactions and resolve of our native French people should a Muslim-provoked civil war break out. It is ‘Islamophobia’ that represents the capital sin in their eyes, with anti-Semitism relegated to a somewhat secondary position in the props shop. The anti-colonial summer camp organised by Les Indigènes de la République, which remains off-limits to Whites and is ‘reserved only for those who have personally suffered under the yoke of French statal racism’, is highly appreciated by the members of the Islamosphere. What a treat it is for these traitors to watch as our immigrant anti-racists indulge in anti-white racism. The enormity characterising such paradoxical behaviour simply eludes them.
Abiding by this ethno-masochistic logic, the collaborationists of the Islamosphere naturally proceed to look at the Muslim organisations of France with puppy-dog eyes. They harbour the naïve hope that the latter will gain power, gradually seize control — first locally, then regionally and ultimately on a national scale — and finally agree to share the spoils with them, of course.
Muslim Associations and Organisations — The Coming War’s Lifeforce
Indeed, the higher the number of Mohammedans on our soil, the more powerful the Muslim organisations of France become. Their ambition is to claim power in our country and establish the latter’s complete Islamisation under sharia law — no more, no less. They are well aware of the fact that they represent a much more youthful community than the French average, one that comprises several million individuals and is constantly growing under the influence of uncontrolled immigrational arrivals and the higher birth rates characterising these newcomers. The major Muslim organisations, whose members are well-versed in concealing their true aims and lulling the mistrust of our decent folk, will silently take charge of managing the insurrectional riots that shall bring about the racial civil war which they themselves are fomenting. Remaining very attentive to the slightest police blunder and cynically sitting at the negotiating table, they shall offer to appease the situation in exchange for increased powers and privileges.
Initially, prior to the onset of terrorist attacks and the strategy of Islamising France, Muslim associations acted as the transmission belts of foreign countries which, by manipulating the Muslim immigrants present on our soil, sought to take revenge for the European colonisation or domination they had experienced.
Let us, furthermore, mention the Algerian-run National Federation of the Great Mosque of Paris; the National Federation of the Muslims of France and its dissident branch, the Rally of French Muslims, which is supported by Morocco; and the Coordination Committee of Turkish Muslims of France, managed by Ankara… There are so many others that could be added to the list as well.
From 2010 onwards, these organisations gradually faded away under the pressure exerted by aggressive fundamentalisms whose goal is one of conquest and is rooted in the long memory, religion and politics of the Muslim-Arab world, all of which are intimately intertwined. Saudi Arabia, a land whose statal despotism is akin to that of the Gulf Emirates, is a model of duplicity that leaves our weakened or bribed leaders unresponsive and that propagates, in both France and Western Europe, the presence of Wahhabism — an obtuse, extremist, intolerant and intellectually desiccated and obscurantist sort of rigorism — by means of a highly generous funding that enables the construction of mosques, madrasas, and so on. Saudi Arabia has financed the construction and subsequent running of the great fundamentalist mosques of Strasbourg, Saint-Denis, and Cergy-Pontoise, i.e. of those municipalities where the proportion of Muslims already exceeds or will soon exceed half of the local population.
Founded by Tunisians in 1983, the Union of Islamic Organisations of France (UOIF), which was renamed Muslims of France (MDF) in April 2017, is one of the most dangerous and subversive Muslim associations, yet one that has become untouchable as a result of its notoriety and the perverse skill of its strategy. It belongs to the radical movement of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is of Egyptian origin and was established by one of Tariq Ramadan’s grandfathers.86 It is presided by the fanatical and ever-smiling Amar Lasfar, the rector of the Lille-Sud mosque. Officially and hypocritically, it claims to advocate ‘obedience to the noble values of the Republic’ — yeah, right! In actual fact, and in harmony with Muslim taqiya, the UOIF/MDF has allowed the Muslim Brotherhood to infiltrate several French institutions and to increase the number of Muslim private schools in a logic of ethnic partition that begins as early as its soldiers’ childhood. It proceeds to teach, in a most discreet fashion, that sharia law, i.e. allah’s law, must ultimately prevail throughout France and even be imposed on ‘infidels’ and non-Muslims, who have already been reduced to a minority in many parts of the country.
White People, Their Implicit Enemy
Another very active organisation and an expert in judicial harassment and intimidation is the CCIF or Collective Against Islamophobia in France, which was created in 2003 and already boasts 14,000 members. Its leaders are always invited to Bourget87 by their UOIF-MDF friends on the occasion of their great annual gathering. And as for ‘Swiss Islamologist’ and ex-convict Tariq Ramadan — who, let us not forget, was incarcerated and remanded in custody on several charges of rape and remains close to the Muslim Brotherhood — he participates regularly in fundraising events for the CCIF. It was Ramadan who filed a complaint against historian Georges Bensoussan, a man who defended the memory of the Shoah, in order to have him condemned for Islamophobic racism (all in vain, fortunately). It was Ramadan, once again, who, in reference to Mohamed Merah (a murderer who slaughtered several people, including children, in a Jewish school of Toulouse), had the good taste to declare, as if to justify Merah’s actions, that the latter had fallen ‘victim to a social order that had already condemned him, and millions of others as well, to a state of marginalisation, to the non-recognition of his status as a citizen enjoying equal rights and opportunities’.
This kind of outrageously deceitful discourse is only adopted by the impostor and criminal Ramadan, as well as by his CCIF accomplices, so as to incite present and future violence on the part of young Afro-Maghrebian immigrants who regard Islam as an essentially racial banner, regardless of whether they were actually born Muslim or not. Their delusion of persecution, which is constantly pandered to, runs parallel to an attitude of complacency towards the assassinations and terrorist attacks perpetrated by their jihadist co-religionists, the secret and adulated heroes of the suburbs and housing estates.
The CCIF is at the very centre of an ideological and mediatic apparatus aimed at intimidating French people and discouraging any and all French criticism and resistance against immigrational invasion and Islamisation.
Let us, moreover, not doubt for a second that the ambitious agitator Tariq Ramadan hopes to be given a prestigious and well-paid position in the new hierarchy following the outbreak of an opportune civil war and a partial Islamic takeover in France. Perhaps so as to restore some Islamic prescriptions he once ‘abolished’, including the stoning of adulterous women?
Making use of a combination of diffuse anti-white racism and hackneyed yet effective anti-racist speech, the CCIF, which enjoys a large following in the suburbs, aims to stir up the young Brown-Blacks marching under the banner of Islam against France, its institutions, its culture, and its native population. The CCIF maintains close ties with the CRAN (Representative Council of Black Associations), an Islamophilic and anti-White racist apparatus that lives off legal actions whose purpose is to bring to light the alleged ‘anti-Black racism’ of our French natives and institutions. In the presence of such anti-racist animosity which, nonetheless, remains obsessed with the notion of race (a concept which, both officially and legally, no longer exists), we have now entered quite deep into the ideological preparations for ethno-racial warfare. Resorting to a typically boorish and charming jargon, the CCIF denounced the rise of ‘safety-related Islamophobia’ in 2015. In other words, the French people who worry about their own safety and wish to protect themselves against the delinquent or jihadist aggression of their ‘fellow Muslim citizens’ are all disgraceful Islamophobic villains. This is the implication: criticising and condemning Muslim jihadism — even the terrorist kind — is already synonymous with insulting and stigmatising Islam and its followers. To defend oneself is reprehensible and racist, and the Muslim aggressors are always within their rights and their claims always justified: that is what is being implicitly stated. This, in itself, is nothing new. Indeed, the Qur’an offers us a good overview of this dogma. I suggest you read it so as to form your own opinion and understand the mentality of those we are facing…
The Mental Gymnastics of Islamophilic Court Jews
Within the multi-ethnic club of the Islamosphere, whose members are the objective agents of our country’s Islamisation, de-Gallicisation, colonisation and Great Replacement, one encounters, as is always the case in similar historical circumstances, the presence of French collaborationists who, in their boundless cowardice, are driven by a mixture of xenophilia and guilt-ridden self-hatred — a bad conscience inherited from Christianity, which offers everyone the necessary tools to hate themselves from birth; and a preventive submission to Islam accompanied by a feverish desire to be granted future benefits by the occupiers.
Let us also mention the French intelligentsia’s endangered monument, Edgar Morin, an old scourge and a man who, ever since the 1960s, has run with the hare and hunted with the hounds. He has authored L’Urgence et l’Essentiel88 (Don Quichotte, 2017), an idiosyncratic and flatly Islamophilic dialogue with Tariq Ramadan (well, well, what do you know!) where, with the originality of parrots, one delights in demonising the Islamophobic bastard Alain Finkielkraut, one of the primary enemies of peaceful Muslims.
Although Jewish himself, Morin has the gall and especially the stupidity to engage in anti-Zionist diatribes (and we all know what that means) against the Jewish state and to dispute the recrudescence of anti-Semitism in France in an effort to please his Muslim masters, in spite of the fact that, since 2005, almost twenty Jews have been massacred by his Muslim friends during major attacks carried out in Europe! Espousing hard-line anti-Israeli positions, grandpa Morin has minimised the number of casualties that have fallen victim to Islamic terrorism, going almost as far as to deny the very existence of the latter, ‘to which we must not attach much importance’. Jihadist killers are allegedly nothing but ‘unbalanced’ individuals, as certified by Morin the collaborationist. In no way are they real Muslims — everyone knows that! In all of his writings and remarks, Morin, who, of course, happens to be a great friend of the ‘martyred’ Palestinian people, considers the Israelis to be ‘a contemptuous people, taking pleasure in humiliating others’. Muslim associations are obviously very pleased with Morin, who represents the kind of good Jew that they would like to meet more often.
Another sweet-talking and Islamophilic court Jew who actually believes that he can use this attitude to protect himself from the coming invasion and violent tremors is the pretentious Emmanuel Todd,89 Alain Soral’s90 own intellectual darling. Todd resorts to the same calculating behaviour as Minc or Kouchner, his friends and co-religionists: anything but Islamophobia, which is too imprudent! Let us instead coax all those anti-Semitic Muslims… In Qui est Charlie?91 (published by Seuil editions), Todd downplays the Charlie Hebdo massacres and almost justifies the assassins’ actions, denouncing an ‘excessive focus on Islam’. In his eyes, of course, one must be held accountable for blaspheming against Muhammad and, logically, be punished for committing a racist crime. For Islam is a race after all, have you forgotten?!
The decline of good judgment and obscurantist regression afflicting intellectuals of such calibre are very worrying indeed.
Islamo-Leftism, a World of Madmen
Just like Todd, the (small calibre yet well mediatised) leftist historian Jean Baubérot believes that ‘secularism stigmatises Muslims’, a thought that was imported from the American Left and has become a burning issue from the Islamophilic perspective. This topic is also very dear to Trotskyist Edwy Plenel, who has found his life work’s key idea in it.
Somehow managing to keep a straight face, others such as Islamo-leftist ideologist Geoffroy de Lagasnerie justify Muslim-Arab and Afro-Muslim delinquency in the name of ‘the struggle against Islamophobia’. By doing so, they acknowledge the fact that crimes are mainly committed by Muslims. They thus abide by a completely ridiculous and delusional sort of logic in which one’s desire to stop and punish such thugs is allegedly Islamophobic. Seriously? Certain Muslim authorities and their networks must be rubbing their hands in delight at the sight of such mental derangement, one which, nonetheless, influences the decisions of several French courts. Disseminated across the Internet, these insane ideas only exacerbate tensions, which act as preludes to the coming great flare-up.
Although only a very small minority in society, Islamo-leftists enjoy considerable influence. Driven by a fierce hatred of France, its culture, its traditions, its deep-rooted provincial population, its ethnic people and ‘little white folk’, described as a bunch of racist hicks, they have extensively infiltrated our associations, our national education system (a very serious development indeed) and the media. They have thus joined the pro-immigrational cause of Islamisation not from rational reflection, but due to an emotional and irrational surge of hatred for their native France.
The example of Mediapart, the online medium, is blatant when it comes to militant Islamo-leftism. Founded and run by former Trotskyite journalist, informant and attention-seeking camera fan Edwy Plenel, who has authored an absolutely worthless but emblematic book pervaded by brown-nosing and fashionable Islamolatry92 (Pour les Musulmans,93 La Découverte, 2015), this high-performance treason tool exerts a great deal of influence within the collaborationist Islamosphere. Another example worth mentioning is that of Libération, the ‘Pravda’ of our left-wing bourgeoisie, managed by the characterless and Islamophilic Laurent Joffrin, a progressivist idiot whose very presence is but the residue of the now-dying Marxism of the 1970s, with his twisted and poorly written editorials and inability to resolve the following problem: ‘I am a leftist and a progressive bobo, but my Muslim friends are all anti-Semitic, homophobic and misogynistic. What shall I do about it? Never mind, I think I’ll just have a nap’.
Among our major media, let us not forget, of course, Le Monde and France Culture, both of which flirt with Islamo-leftism. When you attend classy receptions and soirées in Paris, embracing Islamophobia is very unfashionable indeed. All it does is generate a malaise.
According to Nasser Ramdane Ferradj, the former vice-president of SOS Racism and the founder of the Collective of Progressive and Secular Muslims,94 ‘Edwy Plenel has shaped a younger generation of journalists by imprinting upon them the notion that any criticism targeting Islam and Muslim extremists constitutes a racist attack against all Muslims’. The former Trotskyist, pro-independence Breton militant, and self-victimising extremist Plenel has always hated historical France, accusing it of oppressing minorities. Under the pretext of advocating equality and diversity, Plenel acts as an objective agent of the establishment of radical and political Islam at the head of our government. A Muslim, Arabised, Africanised, de-Christianised and White-free France is the dream of Plenel and his friends. They all, of course, regard ‘secularism’ as a discriminatory ideology that targets Muslims and, beyond Muslims, all immigrants of colour, who are necessarily attracted to Islam. Incredible, considering that the very same thought current was once in favour of secularism, in contrast with the Catholic Church. Now, however, it has turned against it when it comes to containing Islam. Did you say ‘biased’?
